Matisse Farzam vs Benjamin Torrealba Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Wojtek Kolan

Published on 12 Nov at 07:54 PM UTC

HEAD TO HEAD

M. Farzam vs B. Torrealba

Matisse Farzam
Matisse Farzam

Flag USA USA

w
l
l
l
l
w
l
w
w
l
Benjamin Torrealba
Benjamin Torrealba

Flag CHI CHI

l
l
w
l
w
l
w
l
l
l

1

Win

1

Played

0

Win

18
Age
20
-
Height
-
0
C. Rank
891
0
Best Rank
873
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-

Head-to-head: Farzam 1 - 0 Torrealba

They have played 2 sets in total, with Matisse Farzam winning 2 and Benjamin Torrealba winning 0. The last match between Matisse Farzam and Benjamin Torrealba was at the M15 Orlando, 12-11-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Matisse Farzam getting the victory 7-5 6-2.

PlayersHead To Head Match Wins
Farzam1
Torrealba0
Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R1M15 Orlando(11-12-25)

Clay
USA Flag
Matisse Farzam
7
6
CHI Flag
Benjamin Torrealba
5
2

M. Farzam vs B. Torrealba H2H Profile

Stats
$0Career Prize Money$0
46.15% (6-7)Career Total W/L52.94% (54-48)
1Clay0
1Total H2H Matches0
0% (0-0)YTD Win/Loss0% (0-0)

M. Farzam vs B. Torrealba Match Preview:

  • How do the players perform on their second serve? Benjamin Torrealba wins 42.27% of second serve points, while Matisse Farzam edges ahead with 52.17%.
  • In return games, Torrealba captures 47.99% of opponents' second serve points, surpassing Farzam’s 42.86%.
  • Regarding first serve return points, Farzam leads with 37.29%, while Torrealba manages 32.26%.
  • Under pressure, Farzam excels by saving 77.78% of break points compared to Torrealba’s 54.26%.
  • Over the past year, Torrealba has a winning percentage of 52.17%, significantly higher than Farzam's 33.33%.
  • Both players share their highest career success on clay courts, with a 54% win rate. However, Farzam struggles on hard courts, having no wins in this category.
  • In $10K level tournaments over the last year, Torrealba won 55.56% of his matches, while Farzam achieved only 33.33%.
  • Benjamin Torrealba's opponents averaged a rank of 350.93, while Farzam has yet to face any ranked opponent this year.
  • In deciding sets, Torrealba has won 40%, whereas Farzam has not won any.
  • For break point conversions, Torrealba succeeds 42.45% of the time, whereas Farzam’s rate is 33.33%.

Editorial Prediction (November 12, 2025, UTC):

As we analyze the upcoming tennis match between Benjamin Torrealba and Matisse Farzam, several key factors suggest who might have the upper hand. In the recent six-month span, Torrealba has demonstrated greater consistency and versatility in match outcomes and pressures related to match-turning points.

Torrealba's prowess in converting break points and defending his serve under pressure indicates a player ready to maintain advantage and resilience during key moments. This is contrasted by Farzam’s struggle in match impact situations, particularly when experiencing a breakpoint opportunity.

Torrealba’s higher activity and success rate in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments, together with his decisive edge in finals set duels, bolster his candidacy as the likely winner. Based on current trends and historical performance, Benjamin Torrealba is predicted to emerge victorious in this clash on the court.

Matisse Farzam vs Benjamin Torrealba Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

M. Farzam vs B. Torrealba H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

Stats
1H2H Matches Won0
2Sets Won0
13Games Won7
1Aces (Total)4
2Total Double Faults3
1:34:48Average Match Time1:34:48
66% (43/65)1st Serve %59% (38/64)
67% (29/43)1st Serve Win %68% (26/38)
68% (15/22)2nd Serve Win %35% (9/26)
57% (4/7)Break Pts Won %25% (1/4)
45% (29/64)Return Points Win %32% (21/65)
100% (1/1)Best‑of‑3 Win %0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)1st Set Won, Won Match0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)1st Set Won, Lost Match0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)1st Set Lost, Won Match0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

2nd Serve Win %: Farzam 58%, Torrealba 47%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Farzam 59%, Torrealba 51%.
Break Points Saved %: Farzam 68%, Torrealba 55%.

M. Farzam Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
ClayM15 Orlando - 10-11-2025

QF

PERC. Li
L
6-1 7-5

R2

USAJ. Lee
W
6-0 6-4

R1

CHIB. Torrealba
W
7-5 6-2
I.hardM15 Trois-Rivieres - 27-10-2025

R2

USAT. Dean
L
2-6 6-3 6-2

R1

USAA. Finkelstein
W
6-2 6-0

B. Torrealba Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
ClayM15 Orlando - 10-11-2025

R1

USAM. Farzam
L
7-5 6-2
ClayM15 Ibague - 27-10-2025

R1

ARGT. Martinez
L
6-3 6-1
ClayM15 Santiago - 20-10-2025

R2

ARGI. Monzon
L
6-2 6-1

R1

CHIB. Perez
W
4-6 7-5 6-2
ClayM15 Santiago - 13-10-2025

R2

URUJ. Aguilar
L
6-1 7-5
banner

M. Farzam vs B. Torrealba Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

Stats
46.15% (6/7)YTD Win/Loss52.94% (54/48)
45.16% (14/17)Sets Win/Loss54.22% (122/103)
48.68% (148/156)Games Win/Loss51.14% (1073/1025)
0.00% (0/2)Hard Win/Loss40.00% (2/3)
62.50% (5/3)Clay Win/Loss53.61% (52/45)
33.33% (1/2)Indoor Hard W/L0% (0/0)
0.11Aces Per Game0.13
17Aces Total130
0.13Double Faults Per Game0.2
20Total Double Faults209
1:13:50Average Match Time1:8:48
293.62Average Opponent Rank290.17
62% (365/586)1st Serve %60% (2636/4417)
60% (220/365)1st Serve Win %62% (1622/2636)
52% (116/221)2nd Serve Win %45% (795/1781)
39% (22/57)Break Points Won % (Total)44% (215/488)
39% (231/587)Return Points Win %42% (1918/4545)
0% (0/0)Challenger W/L26.67% (4/11)
46.15% (6/7)Futures W/L57.47% (50/37)
46% (6/13)Best of 3 Sets Win %53% (53/100)
0% (0/0)Best of 5 Sets Win %0% (0/1)
0% (0/2)Tiebreaks Win % (Total)67% (10/15)
60% (3/5)Deciding Set Win %33% (7/21)
67% (6/4)1st Set Won, Won Match89% (55/49)
33% (6/2)1st Set Won, Lost Match11% (55/6)
29% (7/2)1st Set Lost, Won Match11% (47/5)

Other Tennis Predictions Today

04:00 PM 19/11/25
Prediction
BRAG. Heide
BRAL. S. FrancaWC
W1
1.003
W2
11
12:00 PM 20/11/25
Prediction
NEDJ. Sels6
GERJ. Opitzq
W1
1.176
W2
4.25
12:00 PM 19/11/25
Prediction
GERR. Molleker
ITAP. O. Fellin
W1
1.52
W2
2.33
04:00 PM 19/11/25
Prediction
GERC. Negritu
ARGF. D. Acosta3
W1
3.94
W2
1.2
01:00 PM 20/11/25
Prediction
ITAF. Maestrelli8
BELB. Gadamauriq
W1
1.63
W2
2.11
02:00 AM 20/11/25
Prediction
AUSJ. M. Kubler4
CZEM. Gengel
W1
1.54
W2
2.28